Saturday, June 25, 2011

kim kardashian style for less

images Steal this look for less right kim kardashian style for less. kim kardashian style dresses. style de star de kim; style de star de kim
  • kim kardashian style dresses. style de star de kim; style de star de kim


  • rockstart
    08-03 09:41 AM
    You have two options. One is forget the current GC and take new job re-start your GC.

    The second option is keep a copy of your I 140 approval. Join a new company. Re-Start the GC application. When the new labor is approved and lawyer is ready to ship the I 140 package to USCIS ask him to include the copy of Old I 140 approval notice in it with a cover letter to USCIS requesting porting the old priority date to your new application. ( I am not sure of job description in the 2 labors needs to be same/ similar for portablity. My guess is that it does not need to be strictly same but least in same field. Example IT to IT and not say IT to Finance or Healthcare etc)

    The best bet is to take an appointment with a lawyer and go over it. Also talk to new companys immigration attorney if he will support this porting when the time comes.




    wallpaper kim kardashian style dresses. style de star de kim; style de star de kim kim kardashian style for less. Kim Kardashian Engagement Ring
  • Kim Kardashian Engagement Ring


  • xu1
    08-08 09:49 PM
    I am sorry to say , but I have not seen any results from IV as well , they seem to be in the same boat as us, wait , wait and wait more, things will take care of themselves over time, seems to be the strategy.
    And I'm more sorry to say: you haven't helped a single bit in your wait, wait and wait and more..

    IV is doing all it can to organize a grassroot effort. Yes, the CIR probably have failled but then an organization by its pure belief and dedication to its own cause has demonstrated that we can help shape the law in the democracy. And by the time I become a US citizen, the time I spent watching how IV grows will help me become an effective participant in the democratic world of free market and capitalism.

    God helps those who help themselves. Yes, in the end you may as well get your GC just most others here do. Let me simply end my displeasure reading your negativity with a good will: i hope the DOL, USCIS and the bureaucracy will take care of your GC dream.




    kim kardashian style for less. If you love Kim#39;s style of
  • If you love Kim#39;s style of


  • Rinsha
    03-19 08:55 AM
    Good observation, although I totally support this clause to oppose automatic citizenship.
    Maybe you are right, but in the meantime there are hundreds of thousands of children which are U.S. Citizen and their parents are struggling to give them a normal life in this country.

    They can't just see half of the problem: if they deny automatic citizenship, at the same time they should grant the right to have the same opportunities of all other citizens for those who are citizen with immigrant parents: both parent should be entitled to work and have complete freedom of changing employer, start a business, etc.




    2011 Kim Kardashian Engagement Ring kim kardashian style for less. kim kardashian rose nicki
  • kim kardashian rose nicki


  • pani_6
    03-25 02:08 PM
    I am hoping to travel via emirates to bangalore..I have avoided other airlines due to transit visa issues...any experince using Emirates??.



    more...

    kim kardashian style for less. Kim Kardashian
  • Kim Kardashian


  • gconmymind
    03-25 01:26 PM
    I remember this bill being brought up last year also and was "supposed" to be passed but never even came up for voting...why do u anticipate this will go through this time? My wife is applying for her "H1B" and she is awaiting the lotto results...
    I strongly disapprove of ppl waiting for their GC voicing against H1B cap increase because they have crossed that bridge and have H1B. I am only safely assume such ppl will voice against IV and all IV activities once they receive their GC...

    H1B increase is ok, but it will cause further backlog for the new filers because of 7% country limit and very few visa numbers. Business is only interested in H1Bs as it gets them the workforce. A GC makes an employee freer and less valuable to a company????




    kim kardashian style for less. I think Kim Kardashian looks
  • I think Kim Kardashian looks


  • lutherpraveen
    09-19 06:42 PM
    This is called Pork-Barrel politics. It refers to government spending that is intended to benefit a particular politicians view point in return for their political support on a non-related item.
    It is unfortunate that we are put in a situation to support an unethical (not illegal though) practise, but bottom line, this ammendment (if passed) will help us.
    My personal view is not to piggy-back our provisions with a bill that is either non-related (like the defense appropriation) or a moral opposite (illegal immigration).
    It would be so nice that if we have the clout to influence the law makers to have "our own" bill with just our provisions.
    I am sure we will achieve that goal with the progress IV is making in that area.

    How come a bill which talks about " ....authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for military activities of the Department of Defense......" can link an amendment which talks about different thing i.e. "..Recapture of Unused Employment-Based Immigrant Visas..."



    more...

    kim kardashian style for less. Shockboutique emulates Kim K#39;s
  • Shockboutique emulates Kim K#39;s


  • jthomas
    05-06 03:44 PM
    This conference is for lawyers and employers and organized by lawyers. The organizers are charging fees for it too.

    So what will IV gain by meeting lawyers and paying money to just get in?
    Or by showing our face to USCIS official, Do you think by showing your face you will get your greencard and can promote IV? If that is true why don't you go and sit in front of USCIS and show your face to everyone entering that building?

    And if you want to go then go. Why do you want IV to pay your $350?

    Doing something is always better than doing nothing. If IV members would go for the meeting there are chances that they would meet some people and talk to them. In the next meeting these people would go to the stage and talk about IV. If one does not do anything there is a high chance that one would do anything in future.
    Please motivate IV members to do something. It does not matter whether it would bear results or not. After few errors they would be doing better and right things. Lets walk the talk and not talk talk talk.




    2010 If you love Kim#39;s style of kim kardashian style for less. Steal this look for less right
  • Steal this look for less right


  • jnraajan
    03-28 05:25 PM
    Has anyone successfully tried this option and recd a response?



    more...

    kim kardashian style for less. Kim Kardashian must really
  • Kim Kardashian must really


  • cbd80
    08-27 02:26 PM
    Hi,

    My company filed for I-140 around Dec-2007. During first week of Sep-2008 USCIS case status page was showing "I-140 is approved". After that since third week of Sep-2008 case status page is showing "Documents mailed to applicant".

    But neighter my lawyer not my employer had received the approval notice in mail.
    How to obtain the duplicate or copy of this approved I-140? What form need to be submitted? where? and how much time it takes?

    Thanks,




    hair kim kardashian rose nicki kim kardashian style for less. ciara Kim+kardashian+style
  • ciara Kim+kardashian+style


  • jayleno
    12-16 10:42 AM
    Its very sad that such employers exist. What did your lawyer have to say regarding this? Is the lawyer appointed by the company or yourself? If the lawyer was apoointed by your ex-employer, I think the safest thing is to get your paperwork and move to a different lawyer to represent you. Please do not panic, fight it out.

    I'm EB3 (ROW)...PD: May 2006. My I485 is pending more than 18 months and I140 is approved a year ago. Recently, my boss fired me. I left the company and got a better job within a week. thanks god.

    Now my ex-employer is calling my lawyer and bringing some alligation against me and asking my lawyer to withdraw my case. He also mentioned to my lawyer that he is going to call the immigration and take action against me by withdrawing my case.

    1...Does anyone have any idea how the immigration going to react after listening to his alligation against me?

    2...by submitting any paperwork to them can he hamper my proessing?

    3...Do i have anything to scare about?

    4...what should i do now?


    This issues a very crutial to me now. he is one of those nasty desi employer's who underpaid me last 6 years not just acting funny when I'm asking for my rights. He setup the whole alligation against me and have some office staff working and supporting him.

    I need help.....please let me know what should i do....please people help me....



    more...

    kim kardashian style for less. Kim Kardashian 2011 Celebrity
  • Kim Kardashian 2011 Celebrity


  • travellertvr
    03-22 02:57 PM
    hpandey,

    Thank you for your reply. Yes, new H-1B comes with new I-94.




    hot Kim Kardashian kim kardashian style for less. Kim was spotted having lunch
  • Kim was spotted having lunch


  • unitednations
    02-28 11:41 AM
    hey unitednations:
    She had the B visa all along so there is no issue of her telling the truth or not on the visa app.
    I have looked into the V visa before as well, and as we know, it is not applicable since I filed the I-130 July, 2006.
    The present situation is that we just booked a ticket for her and the baby to head home on March 17th (the I-94 expires March 24th.) The hope is to receive good news on the grad school application and commence the work on the F-1. Thanks for your inputs so far guys..
    Leslie


    Danger for you is when she goes for the f-1 they also cancel the visitors visa.

    Some people try to get spouse on h-1b and then wait for primary to get citizenship and then file greencard that way.

    Others; are willing to let spouse come to usa on business/visitors visa and then overstay and not go back home until primary gets citizenship and sponsorship through this route.

    There isn't a whole lot of attractive avenues for greencard holders trying to bring in non immigrant spouse.



    more...

    house Fashion » Style for Less kim kardashian style for less. Bling It On: Kim Kardashian
  • Bling It On: Kim Kardashian


  • Blog Feeds
    07-09 12:30 PM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:


    While the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (�IRCA�) prohibits employers from knowingly hiring or continuing to employ unauthorized workers, the Obama Administration�s decision to vigorously enforce employer sanction laws against employers, before providing a path to U.S. employers to legalize critical essential workers, is plain bad policy. �Immigration officers are investigating workplaces in every state in the US to check whether they are hiring illegal workers.� ICE launches workplace immigration crackdown (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h_EhhmjIcqAzvJainjWnJTLRylXQD995P1T80)

    We are in the midst of the �Great Recession� and U.S. industry is struggling to remain competitive. President Barack Obama�s strategy puts U.S. employers and industry between a rock and a hard place. While the law requires U.S. employers to verify, through a specific process, the identity and work authorization eligibility of all individuals, whether U.S. citizens or otherwise, it is practically impossible to obtain legal status for employers who discover undocumented workers in their workforce � even if they have been employed for decades. Immigrant Visa Numbers Hopelessly Encased In Amber (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigrant-visa-numbers-hopelessly.html).

    The diligent employer questioning the veracity of employment eligibility documents can face discrimination charges and vigorous enforcement by the U.S. Department of Justice, if for example, they check only Latino workers, or subject certain classes or worker to extra scrutiny. The U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel enforces the antidiscrimination provisions that protect most work-authorized persons from intentional employment discrimination based upon citizenship or immigration status, national origin, and unfair documentary practices relating to the employment eligibility verification process. The law prohibits retaliation against individuals who file charges and who cooperate with an investigation. Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair ... (http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/osc/)

    No one knows how many of the 6,000,000 U.S. employers, as well as household employers, are familiar with, and in full compliance with the complex U.S. immigration law. Many employers are surprised when told the law requires ALL employers to complete an Employment Verification Form I-9 for any new employee hired after November 6, 1986, or face huge civil fines, and possible jail sentences. The I-9 Employee Verification form must be completed within three days of hire for all hires including U.S. citizens.

    Vigorously enforcing this law without providing employers any way to keep essential workers puts employers struggling to make ends meet with the possibility of receiving huge fines, and even prison sentences if they "knowing continuing to hire five or more workers." Actual knowledge of the undocumented worker's status isn't always required, and "constructive knowledge" will suffice where the employer "should have known" of the worker's status. For example, if the employer tries to sponsor an undocumented worker for immigration benefits, the employer is presumed to know of the workers lack of immigration status. The Department of Homeland Security, through its enforcement division, Immigration and Customs Enforcements (ICE) has undertaken a massive new enforcement effort directed at employers large and small. More than 650 US businesses to have employee work files audited (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/07/more-than-650-businesses-nationwide-to-have-employee-work-files-inspected.html) Los Angeles Times - ?Jul 1, 2009.?

    The focus on audit enforcement is clearly evidenced by the rising number of worksite audits, increased heavy civil penalties and likely continuing criminal prosecutions resulting from worksite violations. Immigration Focus Is on the Employers (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/02/us/02immig.html?ref=global-home) New York Times - ?Jul 1, 2009? �The Obama administration began investigations of hundreds of businesses on Wednesday as part of its strategy to focus immigration.�


    While employers need to be extremely cautious and take steps to ensure that their employee verification papers are in order, the government needs to fix the immigration mess BEFORE pursuing this new aggressive policy of conducting ICE AUDIT "RAIDS�. Employers should be given an opportunity to pursue a legal path for essential workers before the Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers come �knocking at the door.�
    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-immigemploy2-2009jul02,0,7434438.story (http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-immigemploy2-2009jul02,0,7434438.story) Los Angeles Times: L.A. employers face immigration audits.

    Many employers are caught in a Catch-22 when it comes to employee verification. �If you�re in the roofing business, if you�re in the concrete business, you don�t have American-born workers showing up at your door ... you have Hispanic workers showing up at your door, and they have what looks to be a legitimate Social Security card ... under our current law, if they have a card that looks legitimate and you don�t hire them because you suspect they are illegal, then you are guilty of discrimination and could be investigated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that�s the current system and it�s broken." Said Norman Adams, co-founder of Texans for Sensible Immigration Policy to the Houston Chronicle: Immigration crackdown goes after employers. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/immigration/6506722.html (http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/immigration/6506722.html)

    Vigorously enforcing these laws without providing an option to employers is plain bad policy and it could make our economic situation worse. My experience with the employer verification law is most employers are simply not familiar with all aspects of the complex immigration laws. Most employers don't know that if they question a legal worker�s documents, the U.S. Department of Justice (U.S.D.O.J.) may charge them with discrimination. The adverse impact on the economy and on the housing market could be serious. The substantial economic contribution of hard working immigrants is clear. Economic contributions of immigrants come in many forms in California. (http://topics.sacbee.com/California/) The California Immigrant Policy Center (http://topics.sacbee.com/California+Immigrant+Policy+Center/) estimates that the state's immigrants pay $30 billion in federal taxes, $5.2 billion in state income taxes, (http://topics.sacbee.com/state+income+taxes/) and $4.6 billion in sales taxes (http://topics.sacbee.com/sales+taxes/) each year. The Selig Center for Economic Growth (http://topics.sacbee.com/Selig+Center+for+Economic+Growth/) calculates that the purchasing power of Latino and Asian consumers in California (http://topics.sacbee.com/California/) totaled $412 billion in 2008 � nearly one-third of the state's total purchasing power. The U.S. Census Bureau (http://topics.sacbee.com/U.S.+Census+Bureau/) found that California (http://topics.sacbee.com/California/) businesses owned by Latinos and Asians constituted more than one-quarter of all businesses in the state as of 2002, employing 1.2 million people and generating sales and receipts of $183 billion. Where would our economy be without these immigrants? http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/1981220.html (http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/1981220.html) Sacramento Bee: Immigrants are not a fiscal drain.

    Comprehensive immigration reform requires a path to legal status for the undocumented and an orderly system for future worker flows to allow U.S. industry to innovate and compete globally. It will require a complete overhaul of the government agencies that now mismanage a slew of immigration programs that could and should be the rejuvenating lifeblood of our nation. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/opinion/lweb30dream.html (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/opinion/lweb30dream.html) New York Times: Opening a Door to Young Immigrants.

    The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) understands the issues from a deep perspective, not merely from an emotional view. We believe that a sensible comprehensive immigration reform package will have to include smart enforcement, a path to citizenship for the 12 million undocumented immigrants currently living and working in the U.S., elimination of family and employment-based visa backlogs, adequate visas to meet the needs of U.S. families and businesses, a new visa program for essential workers to enable employers to legalize critically needed workers in agriculture, construction, and to provide future flows in certain areas including scientific fields, where as many as two thirds of our advanced degreed graduates are international students. We must also provide due process protections and restore the rule of law in immigration adjudications, and in our immigration courts. AILA Welcomes Obama's Proactive Push for Comprehensive Immigration Reform This Year (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=29372).https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-4886898674742904565?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/ice-cracks-audit-whip.html)




    tattoo I think Kim Kardashian looks kim kardashian style for less. kim kardashian twitter photos.
  • kim kardashian twitter photos.


  • jonty_11
    07-11 04:38 PM
    Normally a Month, ask ur lawyer to call and find out.



    more...

    pictures Shockboutique emulates Kim K#39;s kim kardashian style for less. Kim Kardashian style
  • Kim Kardashian style


  • atumalla
    09-26 04:33 PM
    Could you post your case details ? I called USCIS they say you have to wait 90 days. How did you get past that ?




    dresses Kim was spotted having lunch kim kardashian style for less. Celebrity Styles for Less
  • Celebrity Styles for Less


  • psaxena
    02-04 07:24 PM
    Hi All,
    I have created the evite invitation for the members who would like to attend the Meet & Greet Event. The location is not yet decided but can be decided based on the number of participants.

    Please find below the link for the evite.
    http://www.evite.com/pages/invite/viewInvite.jsp?inviteId=FCRJTQXZAHRPZTMFUNXT&li=iq&src=email&trk=aei6

    Before entering the details please make sure in the "Reply Here" box to click on
    "NOT member.iv@gmail.com" and then enter you name and members attending the potluck item you will be bringing. please refer to the comments of the other members attending the event to bring in more variety.

    Lets make this event successful. Small steps to our successful future.
    All the best.



    more...

    makeup Kim Kardashian must really kim kardashian style for less. Fashion » Style for Less
  • Fashion » Style for Less


  • sunofeast_gc
    07-25 11:12 PM
    I just received a confirmation email that I485 of my wife got approved just a couple of days back. But I myself have not received anything. Its kind of weird because she was my dependent and I was the primary applicant.

    Can somebody please suggest if they have seen something like this before ?Do I need to do anything ?

    What is ur Priority Date and when you filled ur I-485?




    girlfriend kim kardashian twitter photos. kim kardashian style for less. Look for Less: Kim Kardashian
  • Look for Less: Kim Kardashian


  • neema
    11-29 02:22 PM
    I am currently in US on H4. I had applied for my H1B while in India , through a consultant based in US and have the approval with me now.

    The problem is that I might have to go back to India next year for good, due to which I wont be able to utilize my H1b for working in the US.

    My question is:

    1) Since I wont be coming back to US as of now, what if I do not get my H1 visa stamped. Can I use my approval(I-797)in the present consulting firm's name, for getting H1b stamped through any other company in future.

    2) I understand that stamping is needed only for reentering US. What if i just get the stamping done and still do not come back. In that case, can I still transfer my stamped H1B to any other company without working at all for the consulting firm whose stamp I have on my passport.

    Any help is greatly appreciated, I need to decide fast. Thanks a lot.




    hairstyles Kim Kardashian 2011 Celebrity kim kardashian style for less. Kim Kardashian Engagement
  • Kim Kardashian Engagement


  • immi2006
    05-24 10:17 AM
    Does not matter how many points, can u be one of the 6300 ?

    The points are not defined well, so do not speculate, it is not abt getting into Wharton / or yale, it takes years to implement a working system, look at Perm, they started in 2001, it took 4 years to implement.




    pappu
    12-24 09:03 AM
    Celebrating 2nd IV anniversary: IV action Item

    Dear members,

    IV will be completing a milestone in a couple of days. Let us use this opportunity to celebrate the fact that IV has been able to bring the community together and we have been able to get small successes till now.

    Let us also celebrate this event by inviting as many new members we can and raise the membership of IV.

    You can review IV achievements here:

    http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5&Itemid=47


    Pls use these templates to send emails to your friends requesting them to join IV

    http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=30&Itemid=36

    http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=58&Itemid=36

    http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_iv_invite_friends&Itemid=55

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16034&highlight=walking_dude
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15976&highlight=walking_dude
    ======================

    If you have a blog, pls post IV related messages, links, Banner ads on your blogs.
    Banners are available at http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=65&Itemid=36

    Let us also list such blogs on this thread. Here are some blogs:
    (1) http://immigrationvoice.blogspot.com
    (2) http://iv-physicians.blogspot.com
    (3) http://iv-tristate.blogspot.com
    (4) http://dcrally.blogspot.com
    (5) http://www.touchdownusa.org/
    (6) http://skilledimmigrants.blogspot.com/
    (7) http://www.touchdownusa.org/floral/FloralProtest.html
    (8) http://www.tired-immigrant.blogspot.com/




    qasleuth
    07-17 11:51 AM
    Do you have a shred of evidence that the programs you quote do not bring in a cook or a dancer or a painter or a programmer ?

    I got all these from your first post. What do you call them ?

    "unskilled/low skill immigrants cause higher unemployment", "unskilled/low skilled immigration == jobs not created, remain uneployed", "DV / Family based immigration brings in unskilled/low skilled immigrants"

    Look around and you will see anti-immigrants spewing this 'evidence' everywhere, from blogs, to news articles, to the senate, to bars. The same arguments are made against 'skilled' immigration which you and I belong to. What numbers do they quote ? Anecdotal nonsense everywhere.
    Making yourself sound more skilled but making the same flawed arguments will get us nowhere. Bashing another group is plain BS.


    Skilled = anyone having skills to remain employed (or provide healthy contribution to the economy) at that point of time

    So this can be a cook, dancer, painter or a programmer - if the society or economy needs one. Tomorrow, if my programmer skills are no longer required for this economy and country then I can be categorized unskilled labor too.

    I am sorry if I look biased. I have no such intentions as I made clear in my first post itself. All my intentions of discussion are based on the definition given above for the word "skilled".



    No comments:

    Post a Comment